guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#brendapopplewell-v-vampattaxevasion
This is the start of #brendapopplewell-v-vampattaxevasion channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 05:21 p.m.
New Case
BrendaPopplewell v. VampAtTaxEvasion
Case Type
civil
Case Number
CV-448-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:09 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 05:22 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Judge RichoCaldwell.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 05:23 p.m.
@Brenda Send civil complaint
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 05:47 p.m.
@Richostein
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 05:47 p.m.
Hello
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 05:57 p.m.
Who du u want me to summon
RichosteinRichostein
Who du u want me to summon
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 05:58 p.m.
1. VampAtTaxEvasion
2. Attorney General Sadoimpacto
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 06:48 p.m.
alr
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 06:49 p.m.
@VampAtTaxEvasion
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 06:49 p.m.
lemme see his id
RichosteinRichostein used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 06:49 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @Vamp(edited)
RichosteinRichostein used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 06:49 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @meowiitten(edited)
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
yay works
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
@Richostein Just as a preliminary matter can we strike C from the prayer for relief
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
Ordering an apology
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
Quite obvious why that isn't allowed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:52 p.m.
meowiittenmeowiitten
@Richostein Just as a preliminary matter can we strike C from the prayer for relief
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 06:55 p.m.
I disagree. Apoligies are commonly granted as a remedy for emotional distress.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:55 p.m.
Ok I don't need to hear this from you
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:56 p.m.
Why don't you let him answer
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 06:56 p.m.
See White, Brent T., Say You're Sorry: Court-Ordered Apologies as a Civil Rights Remedy. Cornell Law Review, Vol. 91, p. 1261, 2006, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 06-28.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 06:56 p.m.
You have an infatuation with "striking" things from my Complaint. And I'm letting you know I'm not having it.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:57 p.m.
I mean
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:58 p.m.
I know you think it's funny and goofy but nobody really thinks its like that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:58 p.m.
Its actually just annoying
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-11 06:58 p.m.
Please just let the judge answer the question
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:09 p.m.
H
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:09 p.m.
Hi
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:09 p.m.
Motion to strike point C of Section V is granted
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:10 p.m.
Please file an amendment complaint @Brenda
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:10 p.m.
amended*
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 07:11 p.m.
Do I have to refile the entire thing?
BrendaBrenda
Do I have to refile the entire thing?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:14 p.m.
Since both parties are both aware of the ruling and in the interests of judicial economy, I'll consider it striken, no need to re-file.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:14 p.m.
We'll now await Mr. Evasion
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-11 07:14 p.m.
Thank you Your Honor
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-11 07:17 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @Ian to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-11 07:18 p.m.
@Ian Do not disrupt the case chat please, thank you.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-09-11 08:00 p.m.
@Ian Reminder to not disrupt the case chat, thank you.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 12:04 a.m.
@Ian Make sure you're not distrupting the case chat and refer to chamber info for rules
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 11:13 a.m.
@Ian Reminder to not disrupt the case chat, thank you.
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 12:02 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @Ian to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 12:02 p.m.
Make sure to not distrupt case chat as previously instructed @Ian
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 12:02 p.m.
——
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 12:03 p.m.
@Vamp Afternoon Mr. Vamp
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 12:03 p.m.
Are you appearing?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 12:28 p.m.
@k
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-12 12:28 p.m.
@k
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 12:41 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @k to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 02:22 p.m.
@meowiitten @k

Pursuant Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a), it is ORDERED that the Clark County Sheriff’s Office shall serve and file an answer or other responsive pleading within seven (7) days of summons (September 19, 2025 at 7:40 a.m.); that failure to comply may result in entry of default and further relief under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37; and that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order. Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/12/2025).
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-12 04:15 p.m.
Hello.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-12 04:16 p.m.
@Richostein I'm here your honor.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-12 04:16 p.m.
What do I need to do.
VampVamp
@Richostein I'm here your honor.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 06:21 p.m.
You will need to find an attorney who replies to the civil complaint that Brenda has set above. Alternatively, you can represent yourself and do the same but this is not recommended.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 06:22 p.m.
Pursuant Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a), it is ORDERED that VampAtTaxEvasion shall serve and file an answer or other responsive pleading within five days of Summons and date of this order; that failure to comply may result in entry of default and further relief under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37; and that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order. Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/12/2025). @Vamp
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-12 06:59 p.m.
Sado not representing me?(edited)
VampVamp
Sado not representing me?(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-12 07:18 p.m.
Mr Sado is representing the government, the Clark County Sheriff’s Office and your official capacity. The complaint also lists your individual capacity. Therefore you will also need your own attorney unless Mr Sado has agreed to also privately represent you
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-12 07:27 p.m.
I'll find someone in a bit
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-13 08:29 p.m.
@k
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-13 08:29 p.m.
@Vamp reminder 24h to find counsel
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-13 08:34 p.m.
@k filed NOA? If not need to do so
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-13 09:17 p.m.
@Richostein Can I get an extension if possible?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-13 09:17 p.m.
I just got a lawyer for a different case
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-13 09:18 p.m.
I still need time to find one for this.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-13 09:18 p.m.
sure additional 24h to the one i gave you
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-13 09:18 p.m.
ty
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-15 01:04 p.m.
@Richostein I need you to bring in @bob.gov
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-15 01:04 p.m.
He will be defending me.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-15 01:04 p.m.
filing-center NOA and ping me @bob.gov
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-15 08:37 p.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-15 08:37 p.m.
His account keeps getting deleted...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-15 08:37 p.m.
Please don't distrupt the case! :-))
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 04:44 p.m.
Reminder
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 04:44 p.m.
@Vamp
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-16 04:44 p.m.
@bob.gov
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-16 04:45 p.m.
I might need an extension, bob very busy with my other lawsuits.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 04:45 p.m.
He's had plenty of time
RichosteinRichostein
@meowiitten @k Pursuant Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a), it is ORDERED that the Clark County Sheriff’s Office shall serve and file an answer or other res...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 04:47 p.m.
@meowiitten @k
RichosteinRichostein
@meowiitten @k
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 04:49 p.m.
Bob is their lawyer not us
meowiittenmeowiitten
Bob is their lawyer not us
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-16 04:52 p.m.
Sado, when are we having lunch :3
meowiittenmeowiitten
Bob is their lawyer not us
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 05:39 p.m.
he case is also against the CCSO and official capacity
RichosteinRichostein
he case is also against the CCSO and official capacity
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:39 p.m.
Yes and the DA is the county solicitor
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:40 p.m.
So we defer to them usually
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:40 p.m.
The rest of the county government might be defunct but the office of the sheriff is not
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:40 p.m.
And so DA
meowiittenmeowiitten
Yes and the DA is the county solicitor
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 05:44 p.m.
well Bob has not filed a notice of appearance for any party and therefore the tag was to remind you of your obligation to reply to the complaint within the deadline
RichosteinRichostein
well Bob has not filed a notice of appearance for any party and therefore the tag was to remind you of your obligation to reply to the complaint within the deadline
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:45 p.m.
I am telling you we will not be answering on behalf of the county
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:45 p.m.
@bob.gov this is his case(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 05:45 p.m.
fully
meowiittenmeowiitten
I am telling you we will not be answering on behalf of the county
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 06:03 p.m.
There is no statutory basis for a county solicitor to appear in lieu of the Attorney General. See 3 M.S.C. 1 8201 et seq.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 06:03 p.m.
The Clark County Sherrif's Office, as far as this court is aware, an arm of the State. The County was declared defunct. See People of Clark County v. apcc2011 ; see also State of Mayflower ex rel. orangebear22 v. AshleyPueri, et al., and has no independent litigation authority.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 06:03 p.m.
You either appoint Bob as an representative of DOJ or file a written refusal to defend @Vamp
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 06:09 p.m.
3 MSC 1 8101 et seq*
RichosteinRichostein
You either appoint Bob as an representative of DOJ or file a written refusal to defend @Vamp
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:11 p.m.
I would expect him to want to take this case as he has before so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:11 p.m.
Yes he is appointed as DOJ rep??
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 06:13 p.m.
Kk he still hasnt filed noa
RichosteinRichostein
Kk he still hasnt filed noa
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:28 p.m.
Then we will rep CCSO and he can rep vamp
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:28 p.m.
I think that was the understanding anyway
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:29 p.m.
@Richostein Okay this complaint is not text searchable
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:29 p.m.
I can't do anything with this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:29 p.m.
@Brenda Please fix
meowiittenmeowiitten
@Richostein Okay this complaint is not text searchable
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 06:30 p.m.
Hi. Can you cite this rule
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:30 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 06:30 p.m.
Local Rule 4
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 06:30 p.m.
OK, I will produce a text-searchable copy.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 06:32 p.m.
@meowiitten @Richostein
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:19 p.m.
ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANTS VAMPATTAXEVASION AND CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
@Brenda @Richostein
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:19 p.m.
I don't know what Bob is up to so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:19 p.m.
@Nicklaus or @k will take over from here
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:19 p.m.
Please add them if not already
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:23 p.m.
@Richostein Hello. We move for default judgment against VampAtTaxEvasion for failing to reply within five (5) days.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:24 p.m.
The Government had seven (7) days. Mr. Evasion had five (5) days.
meowiittenmeowiitten
ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANTS VAMPATTAXEVASION AND CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE @Brenda @Richostein
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:25 p.m.
@Richostein We move to strike the Answer and Affirmative Defenses for VampAtTaxEvasion because (1) they are untimely; and (2) Sadoimpacto is not Mr. Evasion's lawyer and has not appeared for him, Bob is.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:28 p.m.
Pursuant Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a), it is ORDERED that VampAtTaxEvasion shall serve and file an answer or other responsive pleading within five days of Summons and date of this order; that failure to comply may result in entry of default and further relief under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37; and that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order. Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/12/2025).


"DATE OF THIS ORDER"
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:29 p.m.
9/12/2025
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:30 p.m.
"this order" (non-capitalized) refers to the Summons. Whereas, "Order" (capitalized) refers to the Order you are copy-and-pasting.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:30 p.m.
The summons Mr. Evasion received says he must respond within five (5) days.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:30 p.m.
The Rules of Civil Procedure, similarly, demand he responds within five (5) days.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:30 p.m.
@Richostein Can you keep him in check please
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:30 p.m.
Control him
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:31 p.m.
@Richostein Defendant VampAtTaxEvasion is in default. We request default judgment, and move to strike the Answer and Affirmative Defenses submitted by Sadoimpacto because he is not Mr. Evasion's attorney, Bob is, and/or because it is untimely filed.(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 07:33 p.m.
Why would you count the date of service
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 07:55 p.m.
https://tenor.com/view/ariana-grande-even-she-was-weirded-tf-out-gif-1702287313997575176
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-18 12:20 p.m.
@Brenda The answer for both defendant was filed.
RichosteinRichostein
@Brenda The answer for both defendant was filed.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-18 12:21 p.m.
Sadoimpacto is not Evasion's attorney(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-18 12:21 p.m.
He made it clear he would not represent him and Bob appeared for Evasion (and never filed an answer)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-18 12:23 p.m.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-19 04:03 p.m.
Photoshop?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-22 02:59 p.m.
@Brenda what would u like to do
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-22 04:14 p.m.
@Richostein We move to strike the Answer filed by the Government and move for Default Judgment
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-22 07:23 p.m.
@Vamp ur plan?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-22 07:26 p.m.
I’ll figure it out
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-22 07:49 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @bob.gov
Party: Respondent
Channel: brendapopplewell-v-vampattaxevasion

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired. Request ID: d503a939758d42ea8ab95fe40b98c5ce
ApproveDeny
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-22 08:16 p.m.
@Richostein
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-22 08:16 p.m.
What this?
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-23 06:54 p.m.
@bob.gov appears for Respondent (approved by @Richostein).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:09 p.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-23 06:56 p.m.
@Richostein I move for default judgment
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-23 07:02 p.m.
Upon review of the docket, and pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a), 14(a), and 37(b), the Court finds that Defendant VampAtTaxEvasion’s previously filed answer was stricken; that the time to respond under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 13(a) has expired; and that Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend; accordingly, it is ORDERED that default is entered against Defendant pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(b); the Clerk is directed to record the entry of default forthwith as provided by Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 15 and 37(a)–(b); Plaintiff may move for default judgment and shall support any unliquidated damages as required by Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(e)–(g); and the Court retains jurisdiction to determine damages and to enforce this Order. Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/24/2025). @Vamp
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-23 07:02 p.m.
@Brenda @bob.gov
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-23 07:03 p.m.
Thank you, I hereby move for default judgment(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-23 07:17 p.m.
Pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(e)–(g), Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is GRANTED as to liability; damages are reserved. Any party seeking an evidentiary hearing on damages shall file a Rule 37(g) motion within 48 hours; absent such motion, the Court will determine damages on the papers under Rule 37(e). Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/24/2025). @Brenda @bob.gov @Vamp
bob.gov
bob.gov 2025-09-23 10:02 p.m.
bro I got added today and you give a ruling 6 minutes later
bob.gov
bob.gov 2025-09-23 10:03 p.m.
I came to tell you county has a COI and its the states duty to represent
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 11:48 a.m.
# Final Judgment

BrendaPopplewell
Plaintiff,

v.

VampAtTaxEvasion,Deputy Sheriff in the Clark County Sheriff’s Office, in his official, individual, and quasi-official capacities,
Defendant.

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff’s application for entry of final judgment following the Court’s September 24, 2025 orders: (1) entering default against Defendant under Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(b) and (2) granting Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment as to liability, reserving damages under Rule 37(e)–(g). No timely Rule 37(g) motion for an evidentiary hearing on damages was filed; accordingly, the Court determines damages on the papers under Rule 37(e).

I accordingly find that default has been found against the Defendant. Plaintiff seeks a monetary award; on this record an award of 15 million Union of Columbia Dollars. This suggestion is rejected.

It is ordered and adjuded that final judgement is ENTERED for Plaintiff Popplewell against Defendant VampAtTaxEvasion in the amount of 150,000 (one hundred and fifty thousand) Union of Columbia Dollars as compensatory judgement. Post-judgement interest shall accrue at the statutory rate until paid in full. Defendant has fourty eight (48) to pay this amount or set up a payment plan with the Court.

Failure to pay will lead to indefinite contempt in court until payment, and suspension of Defendant's Law Enforcement Training Institute certification.

SO ORDERED.

District Judge RichieCornwall
Dated: September 27, 2025
Given at County Hall, Mersea
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 11:48 a.m.
@bob.gov @Brenda
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 11:48 a.m.
@Vamp
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:04 p.m.
@Vamp When are you paying me
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:06 p.m.
Only 150,000 :😭:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:06 p.m.
For all this
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:06 p.m.
I can pay in a couple days when I get on
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:16 p.m.
@Richostein Your Honor, the Defendant has referred to this Court's punitive damages as "pocket change" and measly. The purpose of punitive damages is to deter others from similar behavior. E.g., Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(1) (1979). I'm afraid this award will only invite officers to molest citizens' rights.

Therefore, we respectfully request that the Court increase the award of punitive damages to no less than $1,000,000.00.(edited)
😭1
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:18 p.m.
Your honor, this individual is just seeking more money to harm me rather than be properly compensated for the actions I took.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:19 p.m.
As I should. You need to learn your lesson, and hopefully 1M will do just that. God bless.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:20 p.m.
What lesson? My detainment was still lawful, I just defaulted due to lack of competence on my legal side of ccso.

The judge made a fair amount on the default alone .(edited)
VampVamp
What lesson? My detainment was still lawful, I just defaulted due to lack of competence on my legal side of ccso. The judge made a fair amount on the default alone .(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:23 p.m.
Actually, this Court found that your detainment was unlawful. See In re BrendaPopplewell, 2 M.Supp. ___ (2002) ("[Deputy VampAtTaxEvasion lacked] probable cause * * * for an arrest premised on "Failure to Comply" or on the act of recording itself")(edited)
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:23 p.m.
You will receive your payment in less than 24 hours.
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein Your Honor, the Defendant has referred to this Court's punitive damages as "pocket change" and measly. The purpose of punitive damages is to deter others from...(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:24 p.m.
Oh I'm gonna wait on Judge @Richostein to rule on this.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:24 p.m.
You can keep your "pocket change" in your pockets until then.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:25 p.m.
He already ruled.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:27 p.m.
@Richostein In terms of “pocket change” I was talking about the amount you gave compared to the amount she wanted. It’s still a large sum for a peace officer as myself.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 12:36 p.m.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. The punitive-damages component of the Final Default Judgment is VACATED and AMENDED as follows.. The Court AWARDS punitive damages in the amount of $350,000 (three thousand and fifty Union of Columbia Dollars), stated separately from compensatory damages pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 36. The previously awarded compensatory damages remain in effect and are not altered by this Order. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the statutory rate until paid in full. Any bill of costs or fee motion may be filed as permitted by rule or statute; the Court retains jurisdiction to determine costs and fees and to enforce this Amended Judgment. Rule 40. This Amended Final Default Judgment reflects a total monetary award of $500,000 (five hundred thousand Union of Columbia Dollars), consisting of $150,000 compensatory and $350,000 punitive, with post-judgment interest to accrue at the statutory rate. Signed by District Judge Richard Cornwall (Entered: 09/27/2025).
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 12:36 p.m.
@Vamp @Brenda @bob.gov
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:36 p.m.
Thank you, Your Honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:36 p.m.
No objections.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:37 p.m.
https://tenor.com/view/snap-twig-weapons-movie-gladys-amy-madigan-weapons-gif-5285907141321138458
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 12:37 p.m.
@Vamp Tell me when you can pay the 500K
😭1
RichosteinRichostein
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. The punitive-damages component of the Final Default Judgment is VACATED and AMENDED as follows.. The Cour...
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 12:49 p.m.
I can’t afford that
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:13 p.m.
:🙂:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:13 p.m.
Can we do 5k a week
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:20 p.m.
interesting, i thought "150k" is pocket change
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:20 p.m.
now suddenly ur out of money
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:20 p.m.
Cc: @Richostein
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:20 p.m.
We request that VampAtTaxEvasion be made to pay it within 48 hours
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:21 p.m.
or be held in contempt and have his LETI certification suspended.
RichosteinRichostein
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. The punitive-damages component of the Final Default Judgment is VACATED and AMENDED as follows.. The Cour...
bob.gov
bob.gov 2025-09-27 01:22 p.m.
I am no longer the district attorney
RichosteinRichostein
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. The punitive-damages component of the Final Default Judgment is VACATED and AMENDED as follows.. The Cour...
krabz
krabz 2025-09-27 01:27 p.m.
Kill yourself (in game) at the earliest instance(edited)
krabz
krabz 2025-09-27 01:27 p.m.
You too @Brenda
😭1
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:28 p.m.
:🙂:
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:38 p.m.
@Vamp arrange a payment plan with ms popplewell
krabzkrabz
Kill yourself (in game) at the earliest instance(edited)
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:38 p.m.
https://tenor.com/view/chenongyun-cat-%E5%A5%BD%E5%90%83-gif-27388668
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:38 p.m.
@Vamp I'll gladly take the 150K you indicated you have up-front
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:39 p.m.
If you try to needlessly delay, I'm afraid I'll have to move to hold you in contempt of court with Judge Richo, which can result in the suspension of your LETI certificate
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:40 p.m.
BrendaBrenda
Click to see attachment.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:40 p.m.
cc: @Richostein
BrendaBrenda
@Vamp I'll gladly take the 150K you indicated you have up-front
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:40 p.m.
I have 48 hours?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:40 p.m.
Nothing changes that.
RichosteinRichostein
@Vamp arrange a payment plan with ms popplewell
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:41 p.m.
Idk who that is
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:42 p.m.
@Vamp So... when are you paying?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:42 p.m.
Gotta figure out a good monthly payment
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:42 p.m.
I'd recommend you consult with your counsel before you continue speaking here @Vamp
RichosteinRichostein
I'd recommend you consult with your counsel before you continue speaking here @Vamp
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:43 p.m.
What consul, he quit
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:43 p.m.
Make a reasonable payment plan with @Brenda
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:44 p.m.
Reasonable and Brenda do go together
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:44 p.m.
Don’t*
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:44 p.m.
@Richostein We ask that the Court order him to pay the amount within 48 hours, and to post a picture of his bank account in-game
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:44 p.m.
You said you had 150k so pay that upfront
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:44 p.m.
He wants to delay this for months
RichosteinRichostein
You said you had 150k so pay that upfront
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
I did not? I said 150k was pocket change compared to 15 million she wanted
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
You believed one screenshot not me
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
150k upfront within 48 hours
VampVamp
I did not? I said 150k was pocket change compared to 15 million she wanted
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
Lies
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
Dont make me move for sanctions :🤦‍♀️:
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 01:45 p.m.
(sanctions = more money, in cop speech)
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:46 p.m.
I’ll figure out how much I have once I get home
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:46 p.m.
Brenda will receive her payment in an timely manner as the judge order
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 01:47 p.m.
Ty
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:51 p.m.
I do ask the judge @Richostein on how to appeal the punitive damages.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 01:59 p.m.
@Richostein permission to disrupt the case chat
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 01:59 p.m.
Permission granted
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 02:01 p.m.
@Brenda when are you able to join a game today?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 02:01 p.m.
After 5PM EST
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 02:02 p.m.
I can at 5 PM
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 02:05 p.m.
@Brenda I will be giving you 500k in full today around 6-7
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 02:05 p.m.
Once I’m out of work, we can go to the smallest server
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
@Richostein permission to disrupt the case chat
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 03:03 p.m.
Yes :🐗:
VampVamp
I do ask the judge @Richostein on how to appeal the punitive damages.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 03:04 p.m.
Get a lawyer
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 03:04 p.m.
xoxo
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 03:58 p.m.
Eh to much work
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 03:58 p.m.
I’ll just pay this amount due
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 03:58 p.m.
And we can all be friends :😄:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:19 p.m.
@Brenda 6 or 7
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:19 p.m.
Up to you
VampVamp
@Brenda 6 or 7
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:23 p.m.
VampVamp
@Brenda 6 or 7
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:24 p.m.
What?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:24 p.m.
I can join now
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:25 p.m.
@Vamp I am joining server ID: 6bc6-4e15
BrendaBrenda
@Vamp I am joining server ID: 6bc6-4e15
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:26 p.m.
I can’t rn
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:26 p.m.
I’m driving home from work
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:29 p.m.
@Brenda
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:29 p.m.
I'm home, my pilot is on his way
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:30 p.m.
@Richostein @krabz
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:30 p.m.
Please add my pilot
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:30 p.m.
@Marmot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:31 p.m.
...
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:39 p.m.
https://www.roblox.com/users/44051054/profile
VampAtTaxEvasion's Profile
VampAtTaxEvasion is one of the millions creating and exploring the endless possibilities of Roblox. Join VampAtTaxEvasion on Roblox and explore together!I love Wizard101
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:39 p.m.
Join my server
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:39 p.m.
Ma'am
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:39 p.m.
Your money is coming
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:40 p.m.
@Brenda
VampVamp
Join my server
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:40 p.m.
Okay
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:40 p.m.
im gonna join on PC so i have Medal incase you try to scam me
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:41 p.m.
Come to the synagogue.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:42 p.m.
@Vamp Send the money by wire transfer
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:42 p.m.
I will be waiting
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:42 p.m.
Everything is already in motion
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:42 p.m.
come to the synagogue
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:42 p.m.
You will get your money
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 05:43 p.m.
@Richostein He is refusing to transfer the money to my bank account
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:43 p.m.
You will get your money in cash?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:43 p.m.
That a valid way of transfer?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:44 p.m.
The money isn't on hand.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:44 p.m.
It in the air rn
VampVamp
You will get your money in cash?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:45 p.m.
Fact check: /dropcash only works in amounts of $3000 and there’s a cooldown every couple or so times you do it
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:46 p.m.
Fact Check: My pilot hasn't been added
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:46 p.m.
Ur what
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:47 p.m.
Poor...
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:47 p.m.
How do you not understand?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:48 p.m.
Richo you should appoint this guy a guardian he is clearly retarded
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 05:48 p.m.
Transfer the money
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:48 p.m.
It wasn't in the order.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:50 p.m.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:51 p.m.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
LOL
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
IM CIPAC
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
Bro what the hell
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
IM DYING
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:52 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:53 p.m.
God bless the Torah
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:53 p.m.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:54 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:54 p.m.
Baruj ata Adonai eloeinu edem aola
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:54 p.m.
I'm just giving out millions out rn :😭:
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:55 p.m.
Beneitsjivanu benetzvotab ibei vianu azmanase
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 05:55 p.m.
Show when payment made @beenda
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-27 05:55 p.m.
בצלילה גיליתי דלפק דלא עתיד אותה כלכליסט אנומליה גוף
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:56 p.m.
It over 500k
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:56 p.m.
:😭:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:57 p.m.
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 05:57 p.m.
She is feasting
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 06:12 p.m.
@Brenda Just to verify, you got 500k or over as attended
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-09-27 06:12 p.m.
I can certify I got 40k. @Richostein
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 06:12 p.m.
There about 1.5 million in the building
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-09-27 06:12 p.m.
(Not related whatsoever to this case.)
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ
(Not related whatsoever to this case.)
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 06:18 p.m.
:😭:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 06:18 p.m.
You were feasting as well
Vamp
Vamp 2025-09-27 06:34 p.m.
@Richostein I believe this is settled
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-27 07:05 p.m.
@Brenda confirm?
RichosteinRichostein
@Brenda confirm?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-27 07:25 p.m.
yes
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-28 12:12 a.m.
Awesome
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-28 12:12 a.m.
Case resolved thank you for your cooperation @Vamp
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-28 12:12 a.m.
:ijbol:
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-05 07:06 p.m.
@Richostein Your Honor, I believe you forgot to issue declaratory and injunctive relief.
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-05 07:07 p.m.
@Richostein I request an injunction enjoining the Clark County Sheriff's Office from retaliating against persons for lawfully recording law enforcement officers.(edited)
krabz
krabz 2025-10-05 07:34 p.m.
https://trello.com/c/zMMm0keo/816-brendapopplewell-v-vampattaxevasion
BrendaPopplewell v. VampAtTaxEvasion
Transitional Case

This case existed prior to courts.clarkcounty.site shutting down. This card has been created to keep a record of the case’s existence; however, it will not be updated with past, present, or future case information.
Labels
Civil, Transitional Case
krabz pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:09 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:36 p.m.
@Brenda what do you need
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-18 04:37 p.m.
I am judge richo's clerk, he cannot reach the channel at the moment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 10:06 p.m.
@Brenda ma'am clerk richo needs an answer.
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein I request an injunction enjoining the Clark County Sheriff's Office from retaliating against persons for lawfully recording law enforcement officers.(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-19 10:37 p.m.
This
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein I request an injunction enjoining the Clark County Sheriff's Office from retaliating against persons for lawfully recording law enforcement officers.(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 11:07 p.m.
Did you not already get relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 11:11 p.m.
Judge richo has informed me that he will be denying the request for injunctive relief because the facts of this case were isolated and are not likely to happen again, @Brenda
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 11:11 p.m.
I believe lyons is the case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-20 12:01 a.m.
If you read paragraph 16 of the complaint you'd know why that's not the case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-20 12:01 a.m.
This is very much likely to happen again
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-20 12:02 a.m.
@Richostein
BrendaBrenda
If you read paragraph 16 of the complaint you'd know why that's not the case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 06:12 a.m.
Richo asks if you’ve made a satisfactory showing that paragraph 16 is true in your default hearing, as that’s needed given this is a case against the government as one of the parties
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 06:12 a.m.
Judge richo says that if you didn’t, you may do so now
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 06:13 a.m.
And if it is satisfactory the court will grant your injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 06:16 a.m.
Judge richo also asks if the government has appeared for default proceedings at all to contest your request in the hearing
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 06:17 a.m.
If not oh well
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Judge richo also asks if the government has appeared for default proceedings at all to contest your request in the hearing
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-20 06:46 a.m.
They didn’t to my knowledge
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-20 06:46 a.m.
@Richostein
BrendaBrenda
@Richostein
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 12:53 p.m.
Please don’t ping judge richo, I am making him aware of all the updates of the case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 12:54 p.m.
Assuming you haven’t already done so, consider this your default hearing
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 12:54 p.m.
Do you have any screenshots to prove paragraph 16?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-20 02:35 p.m.
girl bye :🖐️: :💅: you abosolutely ATE with this case :🌯: :😋: we settled this now im gonna be a queen :👑: and take my paid vaca to the promised land :✡️: CIPAC money tight on both of us girl :🫂: we queens for life :❤️:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-20 02:36 p.m.
@Richostein Have you watch wicked yet?
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-20 02:36 p.m.
https://tenor.com/view/woo-hoo-glinda-wicked-yey-universal-pictures-gif-11249678755446117478
VampVamp
@Richostein Have you watch wicked yet?
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-20 02:43 p.m.
Honestly— nope :🙅‍♀️:
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-20 02:43 p.m.
But if kayla asks I did
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-20 02:43 p.m.
https://tenor.com/view/elphaba-wicked-movie-witch-gif-10774835638110920970
VampVamp
girl bye :🖐️: :💅: you abosolutely ATE with this case :🌯: :😋: we settled this now im gonna be a queen :👑: and take my paid vaca to the promised land :✡️: CIPAC money tight on both of us g...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-20 07:43 p.m.
@Brenda did u settle
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 06:34 a.m.
@Brenda richo says that if you want injunctive relief you have to justify it, I can’t keep pinging you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:20 a.m.
@mantisshrimp69 @Richostein Here's multiple CCSO officers, including the Sheriff, approving of the unconstitutional conduct by VampAtTaxEvasion and either implying or saying directly that they would arrest me for obstruction as well (despite the fact that, at that time, this Court had already issued a writ of habeas corpus declaring that the arrest was unlawful and that my conduct was protected under the 1A, see https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1279836211703447614/1414735899979157665)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:20 a.m.
Since the CCSO continues to maintain that recording a traffic stop under the First Amendment is "obstruction" and arrestable as such, an injunction is 100% necessary and should've been granted on the pleadings in the first instance
BrendaBrenda
@mantisshrimp69 @Richostein Here's multiple CCSO officers, including the Sheriff, approving of the unconstitutional conduct by VampAtTaxEvasion and either implying...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:24 a.m.
Judge richo says that individual police officers' constitutionally-protected opinion about the law and its application, as well as whether they agree with a court ruling, do not inherently signify non-compliance with court orders or standards, and that absent any actually concrete showing of impending harm, the court cannot issue injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:24 a.m.
Judge richo also says that CCSO does not hold these beliefs, individual officers with constitutionally-protected opinions do
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:25 a.m.
(i.e. saying you disagree with what a court did does not mean you will go against its rulings anyway or break the law)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:25 a.m.
Uh, no, they've implied and directly said that I would be arrested for ooj(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:26 a.m.
despite the court ruling that it's unconstitutional
BrendaBrenda
Uh, no, they've implied and directly said that I would be arrested for ooj(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:26 a.m.
for recording under the 1A
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:26 a.m.
also Richo is offline and not saying these things, so please discuss with him and then lmk
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:26 a.m.
Richo is the judge presiding over this case so yes he is the one saying these things
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
I am just his clerk helping him out in relaying the message that he told me already
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
Unfortunately he's offline so he has not said this
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
cc: @cabot
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
he has!
BrendaBrenda
cc: @cabot
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
Would you like to take over here?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:27 a.m.
scom justice can't "take over" a case upon which a lower court judge is presiding
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:28 a.m.
that's judicial independence 101
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:28 a.m.
Can be in cases of inactivity/where a clerk has to handle it because a judge is offline
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:28 a.m.
Lord Chancellor @cabot has jurisdiction since he's riding
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:28 a.m.
ok
BrendaBrenda
Uh, no, they've implied and directly said that I would be arrested for ooj(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:29 a.m.
disagreeing about a court ruling is not analogous to saying you will go against it and break the law
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:29 a.m.
is what richo is telling me to say
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:29 a.m.
so I cannot issue injunctive relief on that alone
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:29 a.m.
you'd need to make a specific showing that an officer actually implied it concretely
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:30 a.m.
if people could get injunctions issued against them not to break the law every time they openly disagreed with a court decision, it would just generally overwhelm and undermine democracy
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:30 a.m.
I know you know this
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:31 a.m.
finally, judge richo asks if you'd like to make any other comments or rebuttals before he renders a decision on injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
disagreeing about a court ruling is not analogous to saying you will go against it and break the law
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:44 a.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:45 a.m.
Ah yes, cause it's not like the CCSO has repeatedly said that they will arrest me for OOJ if I do it again
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
you'd need to make a specific showing that an officer actually implied it concretely
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:45 a.m.
*which ive already done with all the above images
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
And yes, ratification of unconstitutional conduct is a basis for liability against a department
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
let's look at this stuff one by one
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
Not that that matters, as the statute I sued under, 5 MSC 1 § 3212.1 authorizes "permanent restraining orders" where the government violates the Constitution
BrendaBrenda
Ah yes, cause it's not like the CCSO has repeatedly said that they will arrest me for OOJ if I do it again
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
by the CCSO, you mean individual members of the CCSO
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
I doubt that the CCSO published an official statement saying that
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
by the CCSO, you mean individual members of the CCSO
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:46 a.m.
By CCSO I mean the Sheriff and virtually the entire department
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
When the Sheriff ratifies unconstitutional conduct, that is sufficient to establish liabiltiy
BrendaBrenda
By CCSO I mean the Sheriff and virtually the entire department
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
*
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
All you've showed judge richo that sheriff Tacos did is this
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
which they did in official agency communications, making it official statements
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
which is an opinion and it's protected
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
All you've showed judge richo that sheriff Tacos did is this
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
No, that was made in an official CCSO channel by the Sheriff
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:47 a.m.
Therefore it's not individual speech
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:48 a.m.
He could not have spoken in that channel but for his position as Sheriff
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:48 a.m.
and it was circulated to and among his deputies
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:48 a.m.
Since you wanted an official statement, looks like you have an official statement right there
BrendaBrenda
And yes, ratification of unconstitutional conduct is a basis for liability against a department
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:49 a.m.
There is a difference between the sheriff telling everybody to molest your rights and ignore the court order, and simply disagreeing with the order peaceably and (among other things) saying you would've done the same things
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:50 a.m.
Saying that something is legal after a court ruled it was illegal is ratification, and a basis for liability and injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:50 a.m.
I often see department heads using channels meant for official communication for silly announcements, or to express individual opinions. You can look at #govt-announcements any time for this
BrendaBrenda
Not that that matters, as the statute I sued under, 5 MSC 1 § 3212.1 authorizes "permanent restraining orders" where the government violates the Constitution
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:50 a.m.
And the statute I sued under broadly authorizes permanent injunctive relief
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:50 a.m.
Statutory injunctions are not bound by traditional rules of equity
BrendaBrenda
Saying that something is legal after a court ruled it was illegal is ratification, and a basis for liability and injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:50 a.m.
If ratified as policy. An expression of opinion, no matter where it comes from (so long as it isn't official) is not actionable or enjoinable conduct
BrendaBrenda
And the statute I sued under broadly authorizes permanent injunctive relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
Yes, that's if there is a policy
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
If ratified as policy. An expression of opinion, no matter where it comes from (so long as it isn't official) is not actionable or enjoinable conduct
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
Doesn't have to be "ratified as a policy," just has to be ratified by the head of the agency
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
Which it was here
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
And this was official since it was made in an official CCSO channel
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
which only employees have access to
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:51 a.m.
This was not made by the Sheriff in his free time as a citizen
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:52 a.m.
this is the government announcements channel, just three days ago
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:52 a.m.
Do these look like policies to you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:52 a.m.
A link to a YouTube video? No
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:52 a.m.
There's a difference between policies and ratification, you're conflating the 2(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:52 a.m.
Just because it's an official channel doesn't mean it can't be misused. They can be, and in this genre, they often are
BrendaBrenda
There's a difference between policies and ratification, you're conflating the 2(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
Is that relevant to this
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
Very much so. The Sheriff ratified unconstitutional behavior = liability
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
Ratify = approve of
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
The sheriff was expressing his opinion
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
In ratifying unconstitutional conduct?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:53 a.m.
And saying that Vamp was in the right?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
And failing to discipline Vamp?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
Oh
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
All 3 of which are independent bases for liability
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
They've failed to discipline him?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
That's certainly different
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
Saying something is unconstitutional, or conversely saying it's not, is an opinion about our laws and protected conduct
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:54 a.m.
He is still an indidual with first amendment rights
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:55 a.m.
And he can say whoever he wants is in the right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:55 a.m.
There's a difference between doing that, dissenting a court decision, and actually encouraging people to break the law or implementing an unlawful policy or ratification
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:55 a.m.
But you've said he wasn't disciplined @Brenda is that so
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
But you've said he wasn't disciplined @Brenda is that so
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:55 a.m.
That's correct
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
He has never been disciplined for it, despite him violating a court order telling him not to arrest me and the court finding it illegal in a habeas and now a civil suit
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
Do you have any information as to why
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
Because I think that's very grave if intentional
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
But it could very simply just be an administrative error, they had the oversight of not even starting an inquiry
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
Did you start an inquiry yourself, i.e., by reporting him?
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Do you have any information as to why
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
that would be the Sheriff saying Vamp is in the right, as he decides who does/doesn't get disciplined
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:56 a.m.
coupled with the rampant unconstitutional climate in the CCSO
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:57 a.m.
If he wasn't disciplined because no inquiry was started in the first place
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:57 a.m.
Judge richo can't do anything
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:57 a.m.
It's not deliberate unwillingness to follow the law and enactment of unconstitutionality, it's simply oversight(edited)
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Judge richo can't do anything
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:58 a.m.
He can given that the statute I specifically sued under authorizes a "permanent restraining order" in every case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:58 a.m.
Statutory injunctions are not bound by traditional rules of equity
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 08:58 a.m.
I do not have to demonstrate future harm where a statute guarantees an injunctive remedy
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:58 a.m.
I know
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:58 a.m.
But the distinction is this
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:59 a.m.
If they inquired into his conduct and found no wrongdoing expressly because they do not care that he broke the law, and they encourage continuing to break the law, then it's actionable
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 08:59 a.m.
If they never inquired into him because they never received a report, or even if they did and didn't discipline him for other reasons that don't include encouraging illegality, then it's not actionable
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:00 a.m.
Assuming an inquiry was started and found no wrongdoing, the screenshot of the sheriff's comment is probably not enough to ascertain that the reason why there was no wrongdoing is because they encourage illegality, but it should be fairly easy for you to find more proof that would make it sufficient and satisfactory for judge richo
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:01 a.m.
However, if an inquiry wasn't started, or if it was but he wasn't disciplined because of other reasons, judge richo cannot legally do anything
BrendaBrenda
He can given that the statute I specifically sued under authorizes a "permanent restraining order" in every case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:02 a.m.
Whether he was IAed or not is not relevant to me being given an injunction enjoining the CCSO from violating the 1A in traffic stops
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:02 a.m.
Statutory injunctions can be granted in every case where the government has been found liable
BrendaBrenda
Whether he was IAed or not is not relevant to me being given an injunction enjoining the CCSO from violating the 1A in traffic stops
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:03 a.m.
Oh I understand
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:03 a.m.
(by "I" I mean judge richo since he is the one who is saying these things)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:03 a.m.
You want an injunction because the "action" Vamp took was unconstitutional
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:05 a.m.
But do you not think, in the context of "law, policy, order, procedure, action, or directive[,]" that an "action" is something more official and that can be enacted by the government? i.e. does a specific, isolated action by a low-ranking member really qualify under this statute, as opposed to directives officially enacted by the department
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:06 a.m.
Yes it does, as this Court has already held that § 3212.1 authorizes respondeat superior claims against the State on the basis of one employees' action, and so has the Ridgeway Supreme Court when it interpreted the statute in its original form
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:06 a.m.
Judge richo would love to see that
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:07 a.m.
if you can show that, your case is much, much stronger
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 09:07 a.m.
judge richo loves adhering to stare decisis as you know
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Judge richo would love to see that
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:09 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1386502426160271360
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:11 a.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:11 a.m.
Upheld § 3212.1 claim based on respondeat superior, and entered a permanent injunction
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:11 a.m.
based on §3212.1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:17 a.m.
And many others cases doing the exact same based on § 3212.1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:17 a.m.
Not to mention the Ridgeway Supreme Court explicitly holding that the terms of the statute, in its original, refers to "any executive action"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-21 09:17 a.m.
When a statute is taken from a different jurisdiction, it carries the old soil with it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 10:06 a.m.
Ok @Brenda
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 10:06 a.m.
Judge richo accepts your argument
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 10:06 a.m.
Please draft an order for him to sign
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-21 10:06 a.m.
I believe you also sought declaratory relief, something like that ??
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-21 04:52 p.m.
Judge Richo and Clerk Npz are in communication 24/7 365 days a year
RichosteinRichostein
Judge Richo and Clerk Npz are in communication 24/7 365 days a year
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 07:52 a.m.
:✅::✅::✅:
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-22 03:25 p.m.
@Brenda ?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-23 11:25 a.m.
Proposed order: Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. Defendant Clark County Sheriff's Office, including its officers, employees, agents, servants, contractors, and all persons and entities acting in concert with or at the direction of the Clark County Sheriff's Office, is ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from retaliating in any way, shape, or form against any person for observing, recording, or documenting a traffic stop, except where said person physically touches a law enforcement officer on the scene, physically obstructs and makes impossible the passage of a law enforcement officer on the scene, or by use of violence or force physically obstructs the discharge of a law enforcement officer's official duties. "Retaliating", as used herein, includes, but is not limited to, (1) ordering a person to leave the scene; (2) ordering a person to step away, run, or perform other physical exercises; (3) arresting, citing, or detaining a person; and (4) making any unreasonable orders.
@mantisshrimp69 @Richostein
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:10 p.m.
\
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:10 p.m.
I agree with this :👑:
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:10 p.m.
HEY
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:10 p.m.
I SAW THAT
BrendaBrenda
Proposed order: Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. Defendant Clark County Sheriff's Office, including its officers, employees, agents, servants,...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:19 p.m.
Ok
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:19 p.m.
Approve
Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-23 01:28 p.m.
@Vamp Lmk when your next traffic stop is. If you violate the injunction I’ll move for contempt and to have your LETI revoked :❤️:(edited)
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:29 p.m.
DAMN :👑:
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:39 p.m.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. Defendant Clark County Sheriff's Office, including its officers, employees, agents, servants, contractors, and all persons and entities acting in concert with or at the direction of the Clark County Sheriff's Office, is ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from retaliating in any way, shape, or form against any person for observing, recording, or documenting a traffic stop, except where said person physically touches a law enforcement officer on the scene, physically obstructs and makes impossible the passage of a law enforcement officer on the scene, or by use of violence or force physically obstructs the discharge of a law enforcement officer's official duties. "Retaliating", as used herein, includes, but is not limited to, (1) ordering a person to leave the scene; (2) ordering a person to step away, run, or perform other physical exercises; (3) arresting, citing, or detaining a person; and (4) making any unreasonable orders.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:39 p.m.
@Vamp @Brenda
RichosteinRichostein
Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Rule 39(b)) is GRANTED. Defendant Clark County Sheriff's Office, including its officers, employees, agents, servants, contractors, an...
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:39 p.m.
May I ask a question :3
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:40 p.m.
Your honor
VampVamp
May I ask a question :3
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:40 p.m.
Hi
RichosteinRichostein
Hi
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:41 p.m.
Big fan judge
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:42 p.m.
Um, my question to you
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:42 p.m.
Do you want to go out to eat :3
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:42 p.m.
It ok to say no :c
nooflyw
nooflyw 2025-10-23 01:43 p.m.
it'd be so unkawaii if you say no your honor
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:44 p.m.
CIPAC paying
VampVamp
Do you want to go out to eat :3
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:48 p.m.
Oki
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:48 p.m.
Which clark restraint
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 01:48 p.m.
Restraunt
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:48 p.m.
OMG
Vamp
Vamp 2025-10-23 01:48 p.m.
Let do monday!!! I'll message you than
Richostein
Richostein 2025-10-23 02:12 p.m.
Sounds good!
VampVamp
Let do monday!!! I'll message you than
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:37 p.m.
Hi I'm richo's clerk I manage his schedule
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:37 p.m.
he can do monday
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 02:37 p.m.
tuesday is OFF LIMITS though. He will be at a VERY important event
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:51 p.m.
@Brenda judge richo asks if you also need declaratory relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:51 p.m.
Since you had asked for that
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:52 p.m.
I’m not sure if that would apply but feel free to expand within 24 hours if you want
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-23 07:52 p.m.
If not he’ll archive the case seeing as it’s finished
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-10-28 08:32 p.m.
hi welfare check
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-10-28 08:32 p.m.
@Brenda @Vamp where is this at
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-10-28 08:32 p.m.
please do note, npz_v does not speak for richo, richo can speak for himself
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-10-28 08:33 p.m.
thank you for your attention to this matter.
CharlesLXVCharlesLXV
please do note, npz_v does not speak for richo, richo can speak for himself
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-29 02:44 p.m.
Uhm
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-01 07:50 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-01 07:50 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1445034330068877362 Successfully created transcript.
RichosteinRichostein used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-06 11:24 a.m.
Case Modified
@Richostein has added @sav to the case channel.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:25 a.m.
Say what you said here @sav
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:25 a.m.
You will be contempted.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:26 a.m.
Now
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-06 11:27 a.m.
CharlesLXVCharlesLXV
please do note, npz_v does not speak for richo, richo can speak for himself
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:36 a.m.
Yes buts hes too goddamn lousy and ignorant
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:36 a.m.
@Richostein you falafel eating gooback fuck
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:36 a.m.
W1. FOLLOW CHAMBER RULES
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:36 a.m.
Do not make me contempt you.
CharlesLXVCharlesLXV
please do note, npz_v does not speak for richo, richo can speak for himself
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:38 a.m.
hes too busy stuffing his fat face with falafels
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:38 a.m.
the fact that this case is still open
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:38 a.m.
had it been assigned to another Judge
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:38 a.m.
who isnt negligent and so goddamn ignorant
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:39 a.m.
Amm.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:39 a.m.
You will be contempted now.
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:39 a.m.
I will be issuing it when home.
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:42 a.m.
I need to clearly state that I have not violated any order, nor is there any valid basis for a contempt finding. If the Court believes otherwise, I respectfully request the specific grounds so I can address them immediately. I have acted in full good faith and will continue to do so, but I will not accept an unsupported accusation.
sav
sav 2025-12-06 11:42 a.m.
Thank you
savsav
I need to clearly state that I have not violated any order, nor is there any valid basis for a contempt finding. If the Court believes otherwise, I respectfully request the specifi...
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:47 a.m.
Oh-
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-06 11:47 a.m.
@krm
savsav
hes too busy stuffing his fat face with falafels
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-12-06 12:03 p.m.
Who are you
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-12-06 12:03 p.m.
Latest Brenda or shah alt
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-07 12:14 a.m.
@CharlesLXV quite frankly
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-07 12:15 a.m.
I will be contempting him
RichosteinRichostein
I will be contempting him
CharlesLXV
CharlesLXV 2025-12-07 12:15 a.m.
tell em GIRL
Richostein
Richostein 2025-12-15 09:21 p.m.
@sav You want thay?
Richostein
Richostein 2026-01-08 06:48 p.m.
Brenda is dead-
Richostein
Richostein 2026-01-08 06:48 p.m.
Can be archived @pro
Richostein
Richostein 2026-01-08 06:48 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office
adriannadriann used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-09 11:01 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-09 11:01 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1459215561568551112 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-09 11:06 a.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XIV.
Exported 522 messages